Apr 30, 2011

Improved carbines headed your way - Army Times



Special ops model goes Army-wide; more weapons upgrades in the works

By Lance M. Bacon - Army Times Staff writer
Posted : Saturday Apr 30, 2011 9:46:41 EDT

Half a million soldiers will soon trade their M4 for an enhanced version of the Special Operations Command M4A1. The Army also will replace its 600,000 M16s with the enhanced M4A1 — or something better.
These are among a dozen changes that will provide soldiers a lighter and more lethal arsenal in the coming years.
M4 upgrades will start with SOCOM’s M4A1, which has a heavy barrel and automatic fire. The heavier barrel reduces warping and erosion, resulting in better performance and longer life. It also allows for a higher sustained rate of fire.
The Army is bettering SOCOM’s M4A1 by adding ambidextrous controls and improvements to the bolt, bolt carrier and forward rail to increase the carbine’s effectiveness and accuracy.
It will take about 10 years to retrofit the entire inventory, said Col. Douglas Tamilio, project manager for soldier weapons.
Replacing M16s will start in 2014 as the Army looks to “pure fleet” with carbines. The big question is whether the M4A1 or an entirely new weapon will be picked to replace the 600,000 M16s. Tamilio thinks a new carbine will emerge.
“I’m very positive in my outlook that the Army is going to see a new carbine,” he told Army Times. “I really think they’re going to.”
The Army is hosting a $30 million carbine competition to answer that question. All competitors must present their products by mid-August. No caliber restriction has been placed on new designs. They must be at least a 500-meter weapon and have a higher incapacitation percentage.

Weapons that meet production requirements will square off in 18 months worth of “extreme and extensive” tests. Two million rounds will be fired in myriad scenarios. Weapons will be tested to their destruction point and to determine whether they maintain accuracy throughout their life cycle — something the military has not tested before.
Some of the notable competitors include:
• Adaptive Combat Rifle by Remington.
• XCR by Robinson Armament.
• SCAR by FNH.
• M6A4 IAR, or similar variant, from LWRC.
• SR-16 by Knight Armament.
• CM901 by Colt.
When the dust settles, the winner will be measured against the $1,300 M4A1 to determine whether cost and capability warrants a new weapon. Most major manufacturers have carbines that cost less and offer improvements such as interchangeable barrel sizes and multiple calibers.

More weapons improvements

Better carbines are not the only firepower boost headed your way. The Army has a host of new and improved weapons scheduled to come on line in the coming years.
“Even with a diminishing budget, we’re pushing a lot of stuff to the field,” Tamilio said. “The next couple of years are going to be very busy with some significant advances.”
Some notable programs include:
• The XM25, or “Punisher,” as it is known in Afghanistan. The Army will put 36 into a battalion in the next 18 months. Fielding will begin in 2014. The total number is undecided, but estimates have stood as high as 12,500 — enough to put one in every squad.
The XM25 has a target acquisition system that calculates range with the push of a button. The data is transferred to an electronic fuse, enabling the 25mm round to explode over the target and rain shell fragments on the enemy.
All five prototypes were sent into theater in November, and the effects were immediate. Brig. Gen. (p) Peter Fuller, Program Executive Office Soldier, called it “a revolutionary weapon” and “a game-changer.” Tamilio said the weapons “performed flawlessly” and had no maintenance issues.
• The M26 modular shotgun. The Army plans to buy 35,000 M26s. The first made their way to units late last year — primarily to military police and engineers, Army officials said. But considering this modular system was largely driven by soldiers of the 10th Mountain Division, troops can expect to see it in close-quarters battle in the near future.
The shotgun weighs half as much as the Mossbergs soldiers now carry and can attach to the M4 in a matter of seconds. It has lethal, nonlethal and door-breaching capability, highlighted by a 3-inch, standoff adapter.
The 12-gauge is single-shot, which means less cleaning and fewer moving parts than one would see in a semiautomatic. The shotgun also comes with three- and five-round magazines that are easy to load, which allows soldiers to change shot selection in fairly short order.
It has a hydraulic butt stock to absorb recoil — a necessary add since the barrel is 7.75 inches. The size would be illegal on the streets, but provides a significant spray that is effective to 25 meters. That’s good news for any soldier who needs to clear a room with one shot.
• The XM2010 sniper rifle. The Army is likely to “pure fleet” its inventory, Fuller said. That means the Army would upgrade its 2,500 M24 sniper rifle chassis to XM2010s. An existing $28 million contract included the funds to allow manufacturer Remington to upgrade or produce 3,600 rifles over five years.
The weapon’s performance has been praised by snipers in Afghanistan, who received the first 250 rifles in December. Of note is the transition from the 7.62mm NATO caliber (.308 Winchester) to a .300 Winchester Magnum, which increased a sniper’s effective range from 800 to 1,200 meters.
• A new precision sniper rifle. Tamilio said he expects the Army to select and start fielding a new PSR in the next three to four years.
Remington, which has long owned the military sniper market, looks to keep its corner on that market with the Modular Sniper Rifle. Its primary competition will come from FNH, which recently unveiled the Ballista.
And the competition between these two will be tight.
Both weapons are modular and multicaliber, able to fire .338 Lapua Magnum, .300 Winchester Magnum and .308 (7.62 x 51mm NATO) calibers. In an era of diminishing defense dollars, the ability to train with the .308 for almost pennies on the round will be a must for any competitor. Both boast user-friendly designs driven by snipers. Both weigh about 17 pounds and both can put a serious dent in your medical record from 1,500 meters.
• An improved Common Remotely Operated Weapon Station, or CROWS. The Army is bumping the ceiling from 11,000 to 18,000 systems. It has 7,575 in service. A Feb. 16 recapitalization solicitation said the five-year contract will see production rates of up to 300 CROWS monthly, with the ability to surge to 500 for limited durations.
Operators can expect to see a significant increase in the weapon’s elevation in the coming year, Tamilio said. Other improvements may include an escalation of force kit, infrared pointer and 360-degree situational awareness with the day and night cameras.
• The XM806 lightweight .50-cal. Crews will see the much-anticipated machine gun by 2014, and possibly in late 2013, Tamilio said.
It cuts the weight of the 128-pound M2 by half and reduces recoil by 60 percent. It also boasts an effective range of 2,000 meters, 170 better than the M2. The machine gun, which has a manual safety, allows for quick barrel changes that do not require adjustments for headspace and timing.
The same safety and barrel-changing benefits will be available to the Army’s 54,000 M2 heavy machine guns, as well. The M2A1 quick change barrel will begin fielding by the end of this year, Tamilio said.
Relief also is on the way for A-gunners tapped to carry the tripod. The new XM205 weighs 13 pounds less than the 44-pound M3 they now carry. The XM205 collapses to less than 50 percent of deployed height.
• A modified M240 light medium-machine gun. This one will have a short barrel and collapsible butt stock, and will enter the force “shortly,” Tamilio said.
The titanium M240L replaced the M240B medium machine gun. It weighs 5.5 pounds less, and the 18 percent reduction does not compromise reliability or range. The M240L has smoother operation and a minimum 50,000-round receiver life.
• Lighter ammo. That’s good news for A-gunners who carry up to 30 pounds of ammo. Half that weight is contained in the shell. Engineers are looking to construct a stainless steel cartridge case that will reduce ammo weight by nearly 20 percent.
The Army’s Armament Research, Development and Engineering Center also is fielding a 5.56mm telescoped ammunition that uses a thin plastic casing instead of the traditional brass shell. This would reduce the weight by 42 percent.
“I’m really excited. There are a lot of good things coming in the small arms arena,” said Tamilio, who recounted how, as a private in 1981, he was given “an M60 that barely worked.”
“The Army is starting to realize that spending money on soldiers is a wise thing to do,” he said. “The future of our Army is going to be more centrally focused versus big, heavy equipment. We will see some great enhancements in terms of technology for our soldiers.”

Apr 25, 2011

Pendleton Marines turn the tide in the ‘Fallujah of Afghanistan’

Our Marines are doing a heck of a job out there.  Let's hope their sacrifice leads us to success and victory so that we can bring all our troops back sooner than later!

Photo by Nelvin C. Cepeda


By Gretel C. Kovach
— It would be hard to forget that face, even if they hadn’t seen it just the day before.
A young Afghan man stood on the side of a narrow dirt lane, watching an open-top truckload of Marines head into a volatile neighborhood in this river valley town coveted by Taliban insurgents and drug lords.
The man smiled at the Marines and waved. Then he yanked a kite string detonation cord attached to a bomb buried in the road.
A platoon from Camp Pendleton’s 3rd Battalion, 5th Marine Regiment would have been decimated in the attack. The battalion already had suffered more casualties than any other in the 10-year war in Afghanistan, long before its seven-month tour ended this month. But the homemade device was a dud. It smoked but failed to explode until the Marines drove safely out of the way.
The next day, the Marines shot their way back into the ravine, wounding an armed fighter who was dragged into a mosque. When they reached the alley where they had been attacked, Cpl. Jason Gaal and Staff Sgt. Nathan Stocking couldn’t believe their eyes. Both recognized a guy riding by on a motorcycle.
“Lo’ and behold, there’s our trigger man,” Gaal said.

Read more

Apr 22, 2011

XM2010 arrives in Afghanistan

U.S. Army Staff Sgt. Dennis Long, a mechanic with Headquarters and Headquarters Company, Brigade Special Troops Battalion, 2nd Brigade Combat Team 34th Infantry Division, Task Force Red Bulls, and a native of Williamsburg, Iowa, fires an XM2010 Sniper Rifle on Bagram Air Field, Afghanistan, April 8. The XM2010 is a new Army-purchased weapon being distributed to sniper teams operating in Afghanistan.




(Story and photos by Sgt. Grant Matthes)   BAGRAM AIR FIELD, Afghanistan – Sniper instructors displayed the new XM2010 Sniper Rifle at Bagram Air Field, Afghanistan, April 9 to allow service members to look at, shoot and familiarize themselves with the weapon system.

The XM2010 is a .30 caliber bolt-action rifle with a folding stock, a rail system capable of mounting multiple weapon accessories and uses box magazines that house five rounds.

“They are currently being distributed one per sniper team,” said U.S. Army Maj. Tracy Kreuser, Intelligence and Sustainment Company, Headquarters and Headquarters Battalion, 101st Airborne Division force management chief and the division chemical officer. “You don’t want the enemy to know you’re a sniper, so they added the folding butt stock to make it look more like a regular rifle.”

The XM2010 is a rebuild of the M24 Sniper Rifle and is a good addition to the sniper’s arsenal, said Kreuser, a native of Kenosha, Wis.

“They listened to snipers when they built it, so they took everything into effect,” said U.S. Army Staff Sgt. David Dickson, Company C, 2nd Battalion, 29th Infantry Regiment sniper instructor, and a native of Southern Pines, N.C. “You can shoot a 10-inch shot group from 1,000 meters.”

The XM2010 will be assigned to sniper teams in Afghanistan before it is distributed to the rest of the Army.

“It is very smooth when shooting the rifle, the scope makes it really easy to accurately hit the target,” said U.S. Army Staff Sgt. Dennis Long, Headquarters and Headquarters Company, Brigade Special Troops Battalion, 2nd Brigade Combat Team 34th Infantry Division, Task Force Red Bulls, and a native of Williamsburg, Iowa.

“It’s a good system and I am very pleased it was able to be distributed so quickly,” said Kreuser. “It’s another system that will help us push the enemy back.”

U.S. Army Maj. Tracy Kreuser, Intelligence and Sustainment Company, Headquarters and Headquarters Battalion, 101st Airborne Division force management chief, and a native of Kenosha, Wis., fires an XM2010 Sniper Rifle on Bagram Air Field, Afghanistan, April 8. The Army is distributing the newly purchased weapon to sniper teams operating in Afghanistan.

























Ads

Marines to get new underwear to protect against attacks in Afghanistan

"The shorts are designed to prevent dirt and debris from entering wounds caused by improvised explosive devices, a favorite weapon of the Taliban."

by the LA Times, Read the article...


Or if you can't wait to protect your family jewels, you can purchase these here...

New helmets and new protective gear




WASHINGTON (Army News Service, April 20, 2011) -- The results of a year-long study to build the best helmet to withstand blunt trauma were unveiled at a Pentagon press briefing April 19, 2011.

Funded by the U.S. Army and the Joint IED Defeat Organization, the study found that the Advanced Combat Helmet, or ACH, continues to be the Soldiers' best protection.


The main objectives of the study, undertaken by Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, were to gain insight on how the helmet pads protect against impact-induced traumatic brain injury, or TBI, and find better ways to protect Soldiers.


"There are three things we're trying to provide our Soldiers," said Brig. Gen. Peter Fuller, program executive officer at PEO Soldier, "protection from blasts, such as the blast wave experienced in the body; blunt or impact trauma when the body is slammed up against the interior of a vehicle following an IED explosion; and ballistics -- being hit by bullets and fragments."

Program Executive Office Soldier was created by the Army with one primary purpose: to develop the best equipment and field it as quickly as possible so Soldiers remain second to none in missions that span the full spectrum of military operations.


"We were asked to compare the impact response of NFL football pad systems and pad materials with the Army pad systems," said William Moss, co-author of the report at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, and directed by the Joint IED Defeat Organization.


Because blast-induced traumatic brain injury is one of the most common military injuries in Afghanistan and little is known about how personal protective equipment can deflect the impact of an IED, Army Vice Chief of Staff Gen. Peter Chiarelli directed JIEDDO to review the mitigation capabilities of the ACH against impact injuries in 2009.


The Army pad systems tested were the Team Wendy pads, in use since 2005, and the Oregon Aero pads, prior to that date.


The key findings showed that neither the NFL systems (Riddell and Xenith) nor Oregon Aero outperformed the Team Wendy pads in militarily-relevant impact scenarios in ACH helmets (at impact speeds from 10 to 20 feet per second).


"We found that for a small increase in pad thickness, there was an enormous effect on impact mitigation," Moss said. The current pad is three-quarters of an inch thick. The study indicated this improved effect occurred by adding one-eighth to one-quarter of an inch of foam.


This brought up another problem, though. By adding thicker pads, the helmet had to increase in size which meant an increase in weight, something no Soldier wants.


"Helmets have to let Soldiers do their job. They have to shoot, move, communicate, and concentrate in order to remain lethal and be able to operate in any environment," said Col. Bill Cole, project manager for Soldier Protection and Individual Equipment at Program Executive Office Soldier, Fort Belvoir, Va.


"Soldiers are very sensitive to weight, especially on their head, and that's what we see in feedback on all of our equipment, 'Hey, we love the fact that it saves lives, but anything to reduce weight, please do it,'" Cole said.


Bigger helmets can often be unstable, especially when wearing night vision goggles off the front end of the helmet.


Another result of the study showed that every head shape and size was different. This meant that helmets need to be fitted better, something that Natick Soldier Research, Development and Engineering Center in Natick, Mass., is developing.


"Soldiers should receive the proper size helmet with the proper size pads to accommodate those differences in head shapes," said Mike Codega, technological program manager at Natick.


"The solution is a holistically new helmet that incorporates this new knowledge about helmet pads with one of our new capabilities, a laser-scanning technology that will allow us to laser scan a great population to understand the differences in head shape," Codega said.


For the past six months, though, the Army has been able to offer a one-inch-thick pad to give better fit in the front and back or on the sides for slightly shorter or narrower heads.


"The ability to get a good-fitting helmet is crucial for Soldiers to be able to do their job," Cole said.


He pointed out the pronounced contour around the ear.


"This is needed for hearing, but it's rather difficult to manufacture in that contour and still maintain the ballistic capabilities we want in our helmets to make sure they can stop the bullets and fragments the way they're supposed to.


"So we're toying with new shapes where we can smooth out that contour and possibly shape the interior of the helmet shell differently, so we can incorporate larger pads of needed," Cole said.


Cole also said that proper fit procedures are being re-emphasized.


"We have calipers and tape and manuals to make sure Soldiers get the right-size helmet for their head, and we're also putting the word out in the field that any Soldiers who might have bought commercial pads that are less than three-quarters of an inch should be taken out and thrown away.


"You need at least three-quarters of an inch to get good protection. If your head is shaped so you need to use the one-inch pad to get proper fit, that's even better," Cole said.


"There are three things we are doing," Fuller said. "Because we'll never stop improving the protective gear Soldiers wear, we're getting ready to put out a solicitation for a new helmet pad.


"And we're putting helmet sensors, called Generation 2, in our helmets, to help us gather more data to feed into the medical community as they record the G forces that are a part of the Soldier's experience during blunt trauma and blast events. These will be deployed later this summer with six brigades," Fuller said.


Finally, last summer, Soldiers were given a new enhanced combat helmet, a co-effort with the Marine Corps, which increased ballistic protection. This new, thicker shell is composed of high molecular-weight polyethylene, as opposed to the Kevlar in the ACH


"The number-one issue we had was 'don't increase ballistic protection and increase the weight at the same time.' So we came in with increased protection at the same weight of our current helmet," Fuller said.


Protective gear is a complex problem, Fuller said.


"If we thought a larger helmet would immediately protect you, we'd go do it. But I want to reinforce that we're focusing on our Soldiers. We're trying to figure out what is going on, how do we help them, how do we mitigate," he said.


Understanding the interface between the physics of blunt protection and the human body, specifically the head, he said, is what the Army is pursuing.


"I don't understand what's happening inside your head, but if I can at least capture the data of what happened to your helmet which was attached to your head, during a traumatic event, whether it's blunt, blast or ballistic, we can then provide this information back to the medical community so they can understand it," Fuller said.

Apr 21, 2011

Check out What Really Happened at Wanat | U.S. Naval Institute


This article was published last July, and it describes why many M-4's failed.  It puts into perspective its design limitation and the need for proper and realistic training with it...

"By Kirk Ross, Proceedings Magazine

Some press accounts have placed blame for M4 carbine malfunctions at the Battle of Wanat, Afghanistan, squarely on the weapon's manufacturer. In fact, other factors could have led to the disaster there..."
Read more...

Marksmanship Matters



From American Rifleman
Without trying very hard, you can start a dandy argument about U.S. Army marksmanship training. The sub-genres include 7.62 versus 5.56, and M14 versus M4/M16. But let’s put aside the hardware for a moment and focus on the most immediate concern: how the Army trains soldiers for infantry combat...
Read more...

Apr 20, 2011

Industry Squaring off for Army’s Carbine Competition


Story from Peo Soldier


On 30 March, nearly 40 weapons manufacturers packed into a hotel across the street from the Pentagon knowing that only one of them will prevail in the Army’s carbine competition to determine who makes the best carbine in the world. The group gathered to hear Army leaders answer questions regarding its full and open competition, which is slated to begin in May. The competition is part of the Army’s “Dual Path Strategy” to improve its M4 Carbine weapon system while simultaneously challenging industry to present a better carbine.


In his remarks to industry at the Army’s Carbine Competition pre-solicitation conference, Lt. Gen. Michael Vane, deputy commanding general, futures, and director, Army Capabilities Integration Center, U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command, emphasized the importance of equipping small units in an era of persistent conflict stating, “The individual carbine is of critical importance in giving the Soldier the decisive edge in the close combat arena and it is a key component of an integrated Soldier and small unit system.”
“We must always seek the best available weapon systems and equipment for our Soldiers,” said Lt. Gen. William N. (Bill) Phillips, principal military deputy to the Assistant Secretary of the Army (Acquisition Logistics and Technology) addressing industry members. “They depend upon us and we cannot let them down. The Army can’t do it alone. Industry can’t do it alone. But when we work together, I believe we can do it in a most powerful way.”
The Army has fully funded the competition that supports the Army’s strategic emphasis to increase the capabilities of small units. In separate remarks, Lt. Gen. Michael A. Vane, deputy commanding general, futures, and director, Army Capabilities Integration Center, U.S. Army Training and Doctrine Command, emphasized the importance of equipping small units in an era of persistent conflict. Lt. Gen. Vane stressed that the future operational environment will exhibit uncertainty and complexity and result in the dispersion of the infantry squad on the battlefield.


“There are indications that gaps exist within the capabilities we require of our Soldiers and units,” said Lt. Gen. Vane. “The individual carbine is of critical importance in giving the Soldier the decisive edge in the close combat arena and it is a key component of an integrated Soldier and small unit system.”
The Army carbine competition is the first such contest for an Army service rifle in the past hundred years. The competition will determine the most effective, accurate, and reliable individual weapon available for the Soldier. Any weapon chosen in the competition would also feature better ergonomic features and be compatible with the current accessories and enablers (i.e. sights, grips, sensors, lasers, grenade launchers, etc).  The competition is fully funded through the “Research, Development, Testing & Evaluation” phase.
“The M4 is a world-class weapon that our commanders and Soldiers trust and in which we have the utmost confidence,” added Lt. Gen. Phillips. “Still, the Army has produced a new requirement to seek the best commercially available small arms weapon on today’s market.”
Col. Doug Tamilio, Project Manager Soldier Weapons, hosted the full day event in which a panel of acquisitions experts and program managers addressed approximately one hundred questions put forth by industry – from issues relating to the smallest details to big picture timelines. Col. Tamilio told the audience that the Army expects to release the final “Request for Proposals” (RFP) in May and will give each industry member 90 days to submit their single weapon design that they feel best meets the Army requirement. The competition phase is expected to last two years, although the time frames will vary based upon the number of entrants received and qualified for each phase.
After the completion of the first two test phases, the competition will enter a third “down select” phase where up to three finalists will be awarded contracts to produce limited numbers of test articles. The down select phase will include significant “user in the loop” testing where Soldiers will put the weapons through their paces in a limited user evaluation. The M4A1 will be tested alongside each of the competing designs in order to establish a baseline data set for performance comparison.  After determining the weapon that best meets the requirement, top Army leaders will conduct a business case analysis to determine if it is in the best interest of the Army to procure the winning carbine, and if so, what the ultimate fielding plan would be. Combined, there are currently about 1.1 million M16s and M4s in the Army inventory.
Regardless of the outcome, the combat-proven M4/M4A1 Carbine will remain in service for years to come. As part of its dual path strategy, the Army continues to move ahead with its M4 Product Improvement Program (PIP) that includes the conversion of M4s to M4A1s with heavy barrels and ambidextrous controls, the new standard for the Army carbine. Additionally, the Army plans to solicit industry for bolts, bolt carrier assemblies, and forward rail assemblies to determine if overall system performance can be improved.
“We will select a new carbine,” said Col. Doug Tamilio. “The question will be, do we execute the options on the contracts for how many we will buy and that depends upon the results of a business case analysis. We hope that we get the increases in accuracy and reliability to make the decision fairly easy.”
In his closing remarks, Lt. Gen. Phillips reminded the audience of what, ultimately, the key focus must be throughout the process.
“We must continually ask ourselves, what are we doing today for our Soldiers? What will we do tomorrow for our Soldiers to put the best capability into their hands?” said Lt. Gen. Phillips. “Because at the end of the day, that’s going to help save lives, allow Soldiers to complete their mission, and come home safely to their families and friends.”

Apr 12, 2011


Fire Resistant Army Combat Uniform Permethrin from PEO Soldier

Soldiers are issued gear such as body armor, protective eyewear, and helmets to protect them from threats on the battlefield, but now they will get protection against a common enemy from the most basic piece of equipment – their uniforms. The Army is now issuing Flame-Resistant Army Combat Uniforms (FR ACUs) that have been factory-treated with the insect repellent, permethrin, to help protect Soldiers against the annoyance and dangers of biting insects and insect-borne diseases.Permethrin is a synthetic insect repellent that mimics natural compounds found in chrysanthemum flowers. FR ACUs receiving factory treatments of permethrin will be given the designation FRACU-P. Permethrin factory treatment began in 2010.

FR ACUs are just one of the many items we have been developing to improve Soldier survivability, effectiveness, and comfort. As PEO Soldier, we are the Army acquisition agency responsible for developing, procuring, and fielding nearly everything Soldiers wear or carry. Enhancing defenses against biting insects and the spread of dangerous diseases is one example of the Army’s commitment to Soldiers.

“Over the history of warfare, disease and non-battle injury has been one of our biggest sources of casualties and degradation of our combat power,” said COL Peter Benson, U.S. Army Special Operations Command, Command Surgeon. “By protecting Soldiers from these diseases, it keeps more Soldiers in the fight and decreases the burden on the medical care system when deployed.”

Permethrin provides peerless protection from many of the insect-borne illnesses that pose a threat to Soldiers, such as malaria and dengue fever, which are difficult to treat and can be fatal.

“Since the 1990s, the Army has been using various permethrin treated uniforms,” explained LTC Michael Sloane, Product Manager, Soldier Clothing and Individual Equipment. “Now, we actually get the uniform and it already has not only the fire resistant treatment in it, but the additional protection against bugs.”

The pre-treatment of uniforms means one less task for Soldiers as they prepare to deploy and, unlike previous versions, the factory-treated uniforms do not have an unpleasant smell. While permethrin does not provide a 100 percent guarantee that a Soldier won’t be bitten (Soldiers will still need to take precautions, such as maintaining good hygiene and using the insect repellent DEET on their skin), factory treatment of uniforms will provide 70 percent bite protection for up to 50 washes, with a decreasing (but still extremely high) percentage of bite protection thereafter.

Permethrin has the approval of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) and is used by civilian companies to make insect-repelling clothing for outdoor enthusiasts. The Army will not be the first to use clothing that is factory-treated with permethrin. The U. S. Marine Corps currently fields uniforms that are factory-treated with permethrin, and the U.S. Military Academy at West Point has a contract with a commercial company that makes clothing and gear with built-in insect repellent.

Soldiers will be required to take certain steps to ensure their uniforms provide the highest level of protection from biting insects. They should not dry-clean their factory-treated permethrin uniforms, since dry-cleaning will greatly reduce the uniform’s bite protection. Soldiers will also need to launder their uniforms separately from civilian clothing. Further care and handling instructions will be on the uniform’s tags.

Apr 10, 2011


XM25 from PEO Soldier

The XM25, Counter Defilade Target Engagement (CDTE) System enables the small unit and individual Soldier to engage defilade targets by providing a 25mm air bursting capability that can be used in all operational environments. The CDTE is a direct-fire, semi-automatic, shoulder-fired, man-portable weapon system. An individual Soldier employing basic rifle marksmanship skills can effectively engage exposed or defilade targets in just seconds.


The system allows the individual Soldier to quickly and accurately engage targets by producing an adjusted aimpoint based on range, environmental factors, and user inputs. The target acquisition/fire control integrates thermal capability with direct-view optics, laser rangefinder, compass, fuze setter, ballistic computer, laser pointer and illuminator, and an internal display. 


The CDTE System reduces the reliance of small units on non-organic assets (mortars, artillery, and air support) and the need to compete for priority of fires when time is critical. In addition to air bursting ammunition, a family of ammunition is being developed to support other missions, which could include armor-piercing and nonlethal scenarios.

Apr 7, 2011

Video of the Week

Fox Company, 2506 Infantry Battalion, Afghanistan



 Capt. David Schultz gives a briefing of an attack by insurgents at his outpost.  The insurgents suffered heavy casualties, estimated at 120 killed, and their defeat provided invaluable information.  The Captain's unit suffered only 5 WIA and all returned to duty shortly.

U.S. Army M24 Sniper Rifle Upgrades


Listen to internet radio with IDGA.org - On Point on Blog Talk Radio


Podcast of the M24 Sniper Rifle Upgrade, the XM2010. It was broadcast last year and it details the upgrades to it.  By Major Elliot Caggins and Bob Galeazzi of PEO Soldier.



XM2010 program recap:

*  Upgrade caliber from 7.62 x 51mm NATO to .300 Winchester Magnum to extend the M24 maximum effective range

*  Detachable box magazine for quicker reloads

*  A rail endowed chassis for additional optics and accessories

*  An ergonomic adjustable stock

*  A variable scope, previous scope was a fixed 10x.  Mil-Dot is out for Mils for hold-offs or offsets to engage targets quicker without adjusting the scope

*  Suppression capable for better concealment and survivability

The benefits of this upgrade is obvious because it'll be quick to field and ultimately the new sniper rifle system will be a testbed for new technology that is more effective.  This upgrade will add at least 10-years to the M24 sniper rifle.  (see XM2010 Enhanced Sniper Rifle (ESR) for more info).

Apr 3, 2011

The Big Picture: Afghanistan 3/2011

This month's photos of the war in Afghanistan compiled by the Boston Globe:

Apr 1, 2011

Hot Babe of the Month: April



















April
20 yrs old
Location:  Los Angeles, CA
Height:  5'  7"
Weight:  102 lbs